<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>the PPC Book &#187; online advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theppcbook.com/tag/online-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theppcbook.com</link>
	<description>PPC Blog &#124; Querying for Dollars</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:25:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lies, Damn Lies, and Newspapers</title>
		<link>http://theppcbook.com/2008/11/26/lies-damn-lies-and-newspapers/</link>
		<comments>http://theppcbook.com/2008/11/26/lies-damn-lies-and-newspapers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hudson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[the PPC Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theppcbook.com/?p=317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Title of an article in the PRINT VERSION business section of the Star Tribune this morning: INTERNET AD REVENUE PROJECTED TO DROP &#8220;eMarketer estimates US advertisers will spend $25.7 billion on the Internet next year &#8211; about $2.7 billion, or 10 percent, less than a forecast from just 3 months ago.&#8221; Here is the online [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Title of an article in the PRINT VERSION business section of the Star Tribune this morning:<br />
<strong><br />
INTERNET AD REVENUE PROJECTED TO DROP</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;eMarketer estimates US advertisers will spend $25.7 billion on the Internet next year &#8211; about $2.7 billion, or 10 percent, less than a forecast from just 3 months ago.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here is the <a href="http://www.startribune.com/business/35084539.html?elr=KArksUUUU"><br />
<strong>online version of same article.</strong></a></p>
<p>C&#8217;mon. Is that just a wee bit misleading? Sounds to me like the PROJECTION is dropping. Not the actual revenue. But hey, who&#8217;s paying attention anyway?</p>
<p>Just to clarify, Ad Revenue is not going to drop, it&#8217;s actually going to grow to the tune of an<a href="http://searchengineland.com/searchbiz-3-15611.php"> <strong>8.9% increase over 2008</strong><br />
</a></p>
<p>Nice try Mr. Newspaper Publisher. Enjoy your gold watch and pending retirement. Maybe I&#8217;ll throw you a bone on the content network every once in a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theppcbook.com/2008/11/26/lies-damn-lies-and-newspapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
