Comments on: Your ads are sick. http://theppcbook.com/2007/10/23/your-ads-are-sick/ PPC Blog | Querying for Dollars Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:36:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Jeff Hudson http://theppcbook.com/2007/10/23/your-ads-are-sick/comment-page-1/#comment-4375 Jeff Hudson Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:55:03 +0000 http://theppcbook.com/2007/10/23/your-ads-are-sick/#comment-4375 Tyler - Good point. Let me clarify - They are correct in that the keyword is not relevant and thus the QS should be poor. Obviously, they are not correct in their landing page assessment. But, overall they are getting it right. I guess I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt. Probably because the weather is so nice today ;) Tyler –

Good point. Let me clarify – They are correct in that the keyword is not relevant and thus the QS should be poor. Obviously, they are not correct in their landing page assessment. But, overall they are getting it right.

I guess I’m giving them the benefit of the doubt. Probably because the weather is so nice today ;)

]]> By: Tyler http://theppcbook.com/2007/10/23/your-ads-are-sick/comment-page-1/#comment-4371 Tyler Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:36:35 +0000 http://theppcbook.com/2007/10/23/your-ads-are-sick/#comment-4371 I'm confused on why you say that Adwords is correct in their analysis? If Adwords says the landing page is good, but you know the landing page has nothing to do with the keyword, isn't that a red flag that their tool doesn't work? I’m confused on why you say that Adwords is correct in their analysis? If Adwords says the landing page is good, but you know the landing page has nothing to do with the keyword, isn’t that a red flag that their tool doesn’t work?

]]>